Discover data collection instruments and related materials in the Research Tools database. Please see our FAQ to learn more and email us at [email protected] to contribute your published or unpublished research tools.
21 - 30 of 32 Research Tools
-
15-Item Genetic Essentialism Scale for Race (GESR)
Year: 2019The Genetic Essentialism Scale for Race (GESR) measures beliefs about the relationship between genes and race with 15 items.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Yaylacı, Ş., Roth, W. D., & Jaffe, K. (2019). Measuring racial essentialism in the genomic era: The genetic essentialism scale for race (GESR). Current Psychology, 1-15.
-
Trust in Medical Researchers (Full and Short Scales)
Year: 2006Hall and colleagues report the development and validation of 12-item survey and a short form (4-item) survey designed to measure trust in medical researchers.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Cunningham-Erves, J., Villalta-Gil, V., Wallston, K. A., Boyer, A. P., & Wilkins, C. H. (2019). Racial differences in two measures of trust in biomedical research. Journal of clinical and translational science, 3(2-3), 113-119.
- Hall, M. A., Camacho, F., Lawlor, J. S., DePuy, V., Sugarman, J., & Weinfurt, K. (2006). Measuring trust in medical researchers. Medical care, 44(11), 1048-1053.
Contact: [email protected] -
Trust in Medical Researchers Scale
Year: 2006Mainous and colleagues report the development and validation of the 12-item Trust in Medical Resesearchers Scale. This scale is designed to be self-administered.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Cunningham-Erves, J., Villalta-Gil, V., Wallston, K. A., Boyer, A. P., & Wilkins, C. H. (2019). Racial differences in two measures of trust in biomedical research. Journal of clinical and translational science, 3(2-3), 113-119.
- Mainous, A. G., Smith, D. W., Geesey, M. E., & Tilley, B. C. (2006). Development of a measure to assess patient trust in medical researchers. The Annals of Family Medicine, 4(3), 247-252.
Contact: [email protected] -
Scenarios for Ethical and Legal Analysis of Genomic Data Sharing Practices
Year: 2020McWhirter and colleagues report the development and validation of 6 scenarios based on actual genomic data sharing pratices in Australia.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):McWhirter, R., Eckstein, L., Chalmers, D., Critchley, C., Nielsen, J., Otlowski, M., & Nicol, D. (2020). A scenario-based methodology for analyzing the ethical, legal, and social issues in genomic data sharing. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 355-364.
Contact: [email protected] -
The IntegratedEthics Staff Survey™ (IESS)
Year: 2013This survey, created by Pearlman and colleagues, measures the attitudes of staff towards ethical practices in multiple areas of a healthcare organizations.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Pearlman, R. A., Bottrell, M. M., Altemose, J., Foglia, M. B., & Fox, E. (2013). The IntegratedEthicsTM Staff Survey: A tool to evaluate and improve ethical practices in health care. AJOB Primary Research, 4(1), 7-19.
-
REVEAL Impact of Genetic Testing in Alzheimer’s Disease (IGT-AD) Scale
Year: 2010Chung and colleagues created the REVEAL Impact of Genetic Testing in Alzheimer’s Disease (IGT-AD) Scale to measure psychological impact of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease (AD).
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Chung, W, W., Chen, C. A., Cupples, L. A., Roberts, J. Scott, Hiraki, S. C., Nair, A. K., Green, R. C., & Stern, R. A. (2009). A new scale measuring psychologic impact of genetic susceptibility testing for Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 23(1), 50-56.
Contact: [email protected] -
Consent Form, All of Us Research Program
Year: 2021This consent form is utilized by the All of Us Research Program (All of Us), a health research program, funded by the National Institutes of Health, that will study health data from over one millio
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Doerr, M., Moore, S., Barone, V., Sutherland, S., Bot, B. M., Suver, C., & Wilbanks, J. (2021). Assessment of the All of Us research program's informed consent process. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12(2), 72–83.
-
HIPAA Authorization for Research–Electronic Health Record Supplement, All of Us Research Program
Year: 2018This form includes information for participants and collects a consent for the the All of Us Research Program (All of Us) to access to their electronic health records.
Research Population: AdultsValidation(s):- Doerr, M., Moore, S., Barone, V., Sutherland, S., Bot, B. M., Suver, C., & Wilbanks, J. (2021). Assessment of the All of Us research program's informed consent process. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12(2), 72–83.
-
Race Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) Scale
Bonham and colleagues developed the Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale to assess the degree to which health professionals employ race in their clinical decision making.
Research Population: Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, NursesValidation(s):Bonham, V. L., Sellers, S. L., Woolford, S. (2014). Physicians’ knowledge, use, and beliefs about race and genetic variation: New measures and new insight. BMC Health Services Research, 14, Article 456.
Contact: [email protected] -
The Parental Personal Utility Scale (Parent PrU)
Year: 2024The Personal Utility Scale (PrU) asks participants to rate how useful they find nineteen outcomes of genome sequencing on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all useful) to 7 (extremely useful).
Research Population: Adults, ParentsValidation(s):Turbitt, E., Kohler, J. N., Brothers, K. B., Outram, S. M., Rini, C., Sahin-Hodoglugil, N., Leo, M. C., & Biesecker, B. B. (2024) The Parent PrU: A measure to assess personal utility of pediatric genomic results. Genetics in Medicine, 16(1), Article 100994.
Contact: [email protected]