When individuals are queried about whether or not they wish to receive individual research results about themselves that are discovered in the course of genomic research, the majority indicate that they prefer receiving all results, including those that are of limited validity and actionability. These preferences are in sharp contrast to the recommendations of experts who are wary of the potential for confusion and outright harm if questionable results are returned, and thus generally recommend returning only results of high validity and actionability.
Genomic information offers the opportunity for "personalized prevention" in both clinical practice and public health settings. To date, such efforts have focused primarily on chronic diseases and their behavioral risk factors. We propose an exploratory CEER to study the ethical, legal, social and policy (ELSP) issues arising in the novel and timely context of infectious disease.
Dr. Korngiebel's long-term goal is to become an independent researcher at the intersection of bioethics, informatics, and genetic testing. To work toward this goal, she will receive rigorous training that includes 11 courses supplemented by directed tutorials in order to complement her qualitative research skills with proficiency in genetics-related bioethics, informatics pertaining to Electronic Medical Record Health Information Technology, and quantitative data analysis. The research project will allow her to apply the knowledge gained through formal instruction.
The prevailing model for ethical review of multicenter clinical trials is a distributed system of reviews conducted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each institution engaged in the conduct of the trial. Conducting multiple reviews of a single protocol can delay the commencement of multicenter research and delay patient access to potentially beneficial treatments.
Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing, which utilizes cell-free fetal DNA and advances in sequencing technology, is revolutionizing the practice of obstetrics. While currently used as a screen for a limited number of aneuploidies and genetic conditions, noninvasive testing is anticipated to employ whole fetal exome and genome sequencing to identify not only monogenic disorders but also microduplications, microdeletions, and variants of uncertain clinical significance.
Genomics-based technologies are increasingly used in clinical care and are highly relevant to public health because of their potential use in assessing risk, diagnosing, and developing treatment plans. Access to genomic tests often depends on cost and coverage of services by the health plan. No studies, to our knowledge, identify whether access and reimbursement issues relating to guideline-recommended pharmacogenomic tests exist, and what the potential implications of barriers to access and/or differential access for patients, providers, and society are.
Concerns about privacy and personal identity impede use of data about genomic variation, phenotypes, demographics, and exposures from large numbers of people to uncover the contributions of such information on health and disease, knowledge that can improve clinical care. People worry that these data and genomic data in particular, cannot be secured. Many fear that data about them will be used in ways they oppose (e.g., to deny them and those they love access to jobs and insurance) because existing legal rules about such uses are not comprehensive.
Responsible conduct of research (RCR) is an essential requirement for research training in developed countries and most academic and funding institutions require researchers to obtain such training before starting a research project Jordan is one of the more academically established countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region with a high per-capita university education and progressive research agenda. It is also the hub for pharmaceutical drug development with over 20 companies generating generic drugs and exporting it to the region and globally.
Family history is an essential predictor of disease risk, yet it is often incomplete, inaccurate, and underutilized in today's clinical settings. With the increasingly widespread adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs), many individuals are born today into a health system in which many of their family members have substantial longitudinal EMRs. These records present a vast untapped resource for deriving Data-Driven Family Histories - family histories constructed directly from the EMRs of patients' family members.
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), a cell-free DNA screening test of fetal chromosomal abnormalities using maternal plasma, has been heralded as ?revolutionizing prenatal screening and diagnosis. Introduced commercially in late 2011, the rapid clinical adoption of NIPT highlights genomic medicine?s growth and enormous promise for patient care. The research landscape stemming from genomic and precision medicine endeavors, however, necessitates concomitant efforts to monitor population health impact and assure equity in access to these advances.