Results from several genome-wide association (GWA) studies have recently emerged showcasing the discovery of specific genetic variations found to be associated with several common, complex diseases. Leveraging these findings and fueled by the rapidly decreasing costs of performing genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) scans, a small number of companies have begun offering tests that aim to calculate an individual's risk for these common diseases using this genome-wide technology, direct-to-consumer (DTC) over the internet.

The rapid identification of genetic risk factors for common, complex diseases poses great opportunities and challenges for public health. Genetic information is increasingly being utilized as part of commercial efforts, including direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing to provide risk information on common diseases to consumers. Very few empirical data have been gathered to understand the characteristics of DTC test consumers, the psychological, behavioral and health impact, and the ethical, legal and social issues associated with DTC services.

Forensic DNA profiling is increasingly becoming a standard tool in the search for missing people in the aftermath of mass violence and mass disaster. Yet, there has been very little systematic effort to identify and analyze the major ethical and policy challenges associated with this new use of genetic technology. Thus, stakeholders involved in post-conflict and post-disaster investigations have had to develop their own ad hoc rules and ethical principles for the identification process.

This empirical and normative bioethics research project will guide policy and practice about the disclosure of genomic incidental findings (GIFD), a much-debated topic. With ethical guidance from a multidisciplinary ELSI Working Group, we will conduct an experiment designed to develop strategies for offering incidental findings to family members of probands in a biobank for pancreatic cancer.

The specific aim of this project is to determine what criteria should govern return of individual results of pediatric genomic research, using analysis of US law and international guidelines regarding decision making for and by minors as the foundation. This issue, which has received remarkably little attention, must be resolved if this research, which is vital to understanding the contributions of genetic variation to the health of children, is to proceed.

Genetic researchers are rapidly adopting methods of whole exome and whole genome sequencing to identify the hereditary bases for human disease as the cost of sequencing rapidly declines and the pipelines for analysis and databases of normal variation become available and more robust. Although most researchers have focused on particular diseases, comprehensive genome analysis also provides data about susceptibility to hereditary conditions beyond the original study aims.

When individuals are queried about whether or not they wish to receive individual research results about themselves that are discovered in the course of genomic research, the majority indicate that they prefer receiving all results, including those that are of limited validity and actionability. These preferences are in sharp contrast to the recommendations of experts who are wary of the potential for confusion and outright harm if questionable results are returned, and thus generally recommend returning only results of high validity and actionability.

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) is a genome-wide technology that allows for identification of genomic alterations, such as deletions and duplications, at an unprecedented resolution. However, many genetic variations are identified that have unknown or uncertain clinical significance. New clinical guidelines recommend CMA testing for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). ASD is one of the most common serious developmental disorders, found in almost 1% of children in the United States.

Advances in genomic science are attracting the interest of the U.S. military for their potential to improve medical care for members of the militay and to aid in military recruitment, training and specialization, and mission accomplishment. In addition, large DNA banks operated by the military could be a valuable resource for military and civilian researchers.

Personal genetic and genomic information is becoming more widely available and affordable, generating increased discussions on the merits and dangers of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing and appropriateness of using personal genetic information in various contexts (e.g. clinics, research laboratories, courtrooms, and classrooms). While attention has focused predominately on health-related testing, conversations about DTC genetic ancestry testing and information are intensifying as well.