Innovations in next-generation DNA sequencing technologies, accompanied by exponential drops in cost, have made it possible for clinicians to begin to use whole genome sequencing (WGS) to diagnose, treat, and predict disease. The extent to which WGS will improve health outcomes on a population level, however, will depend on effective oversight of its commercialization and use.

Personalized medicine (PM) has the potential to transform medicine and the health care system over the next decade. An overlooked variable that will play an important role in the implementation of PM is the potential for legal liability. Physicians, a key gatekeeper in the uptake of PM, are at the greatest risk of liability. Currently, there is great uncertainty, disagreement and rapid change with regard to the use of PM tests in clinical care.

Obtaining valid consent for the collection and storage of biospecimens and data for future, unspecified research use remains a significant challenge. Numerous studies have documented that research participants in a variety of settings-including biobanking-do not understand important aspects of the research to which they consented. To correct this problem, two major challenges must be overcome.

The purpose of this study is to provide empirical data on effects of intellectual property (IP) and commercialization on clinical translation of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) and identify potential barriers to clinical adoption and patient access. Advances in technologies for genetic analysis of cell-free fetal DNA could make NIPT routine. Early clinical trials indicate that sequencing-based NIPT tests for chromosomal aneuploidies are more accurate than currently used noninvasive screening tests.

Harvesting the benefits of genomics requires a new kind of transdisciplinary cooperation. Over the next three years, we will create the Center for Transdisciplinary ELSI Research in Translational Genomics (CT2G) to address key ELSI questions in translational research. The proposed Center brings together the unique resources of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), including its Division of Research, and the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), including the Hastings College of the Law Consortium on Law, Science & Health Policy.

This application proposes the continuation of a Center for Research on the Ethical, Legal & Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic & Behavioral (PNB) Genetics at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC), in collaboration with The Hastings Center. We have been funded since April 2010, initially under a developing center award and since 2013 as a full Center of Excellence in ELSI Research (CEER).

Genomic medicine has, on one hand, the power to predict potentially debilitating disease before its actual onset; on the other hand, it creates challenges for patients in determining how to assess uncertainty and the risk of developing genomic-related adult-onset medical conditions. If adults are married when genetic testing occurs, they may discuss the test results with their spouses and decide on future actions together, such as disclosing the genetic test results to others; their spouses may also be affected by these discussions and decisions.

Endstage renal disease (ESRD) or kidney failure affects over 500,000 persons in the United States and disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minority populations. Compared to whites, African Americans are 2-4 times more likely to develop ESRD, and represent 32% of the ESRD population, while only representing 13% of the US population. Two independent variants of the Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene, G1 and G2, have been associated with a 7 to 10-fold greater risk of developing non-diabetic ESRD in African Americans.

This 3-year R01 based at the University of Minnesota and Vanderbilt University will convene a national Working Group of top legal and scientific experts to analyze current U.S. federal and state law, regulation, and guidance on translational genomics, and to generate consensus recommendations on what the law should be, to optimize successful translation of genomics into clinical use. The law underlying genomics is currently unclear, poorly understood, and contested.

Whole genome sequencing has vast potential to improve the care of generally healthy adults by identifying predispositions for disease to facilitate targeted prevention and screening efforts, by informing treatment options when illnesses do develop, and more. It may also cause more harm than good through false-positive findings, through unnecessary monitoring because of incomplete genetic penetrance, and because the conditions identified by genomic sequencing may lack effective prevention options.