Most, if not all, human diseases have one or more genetic factors that contribute to cause, likelihood of occurrence, severity, and response to existing or experimental treatments. There is a general perception that the ability to define a person's genetic makeup will lead to better health, improved treatments and a better understanding of risks to other family members. However, many genetic technologies increase uncertainty and confusion in the minds of patients, relatives, doctors, health insurers and others.

Pharmacogenetic testing is considered one of the most promising clinical applications arising from genomics research, with the potential to reduce adverse drug responses and improve efficacy of drug treatment. Because pharmacogenetic tests address a specific question about drug therapy, they have generally been viewed as having fewer ethical and social implications than other types of genetic testing. Yet some policy concerns will need to be addressed before pharmacogenetic tests can be introduced appropriately into clinical practice.

Evolving intellectual property (IP) policies of governments and organizations are impacting biotechnology sectors and access to genetic materials for development of pharmaceuticals. The National Institutes of Health, through the Human Genome Project among others, specifically recognizes the need for policy options in the area of intellectual property to facilitate the widespread use of genetic and genomic information in both research and clinical settings.

This project is an investigation of the implications of research on ancient and contemporary human microbiomes for the social and ancestral identities of indigenous people. It will engage indigenous communities on the U.S. Southern Plains (Apache, Caddo, and Kiowa nations) and in the Andean region of Peru (Aymara, Quechua and Uros-descended communities).

The objective of this training and research project is to develop the candidate into an independent and interdisciplinary ELSI researcher, with the ability to intertwine qualitative empirical with normative approaches to issues in genetics and genomics.

H3Africa provides an unprecedented opportunity to study genetic and genomic technologies into research, diagnosis, intervention, and treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD) in Africa. As such, involving a few African Centers already involved in the forefront of Sickle Cell Disease Research in Africa with moderate expertise on psychosocial research (Cameroon), newborn screening (Ghana) or genomics studies (Tanzania) could serves as a reservoir for rigorous examination of a wide range of accompanying ethical, psychosocial, cultural, and policy issues.

Advances in psychiatric genetics are likely to offer major diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, but also legal and social-related risks, to individuals who were diagnosed with, or have a proclivity for, psychiatric disorders. In response, courts and policy-makers will have to ensure that psychiatric genetic data are used to promote, and not to obstruct, equality, justice, and social inclusion.

This project employs multiple methods and a transdisciplinary approach to explore policy options for US federal and state governments seeking to address how life, long-term care, and disability insurers use genetic information. The analysis will focus on legal standards of actuarial justification, that is, the requirement that insurers m+R409ust show a statistical correlation between a risk factor and increased cost in order to use that factor in an underwriting decision such as a policy denial or an increased premium.

The advent of clinical genome sequencing to identify patients at risk for serious diseases and to tailor treatments promises to greatly improve health outcomes and provide a foundation for the delivery of Precision Medicine. However, even as laboratory methods to perform sequencing become highly efficient, uncertainty around the optimal breadth and economic value of sequencing as well as ambiguity around which individuals should be tested presents a critical barrier to wider use.

Advances in technology have led to the availability of genetic testing for a wide range of conditions for healthy or high-risk newborns. It is expected that the funds spent on genetic testing in the U.S. will reach $25 billion by 2021. With the numerous uses of genomic information, understanding the clinical value and long-term impact of genomic technologies on morbidity, mortality, quality of life, and diagnosis and treatment costs is essential.