The ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) underlying the development and implementation of state-sponsored birth cohort studies and their accompanying biobanks are complex and potentially volatile. Michigan and other states, such as Connecticut and California, are in the midst of investigating and deliberating on how to set up biobanks and there is a pressing need for practical ELSI research and guidelines for these historic initiatives.

This project explores whether the current regulations for protecting research subjects will provide adequate protections and guidance for future research involving human prenatal gene therapy. It seeks to determine whether additions or other revisions to the regulations are needed to deal with the ethical issues that will be raised in protecting human subjects in such research. Examples of issues that will need to be addressed include the following: 1) The current regulations do not specify how risks and benefits should be balanced between the fetus and pregnant woman.

Most discussion of the ethical challenges raised by the growth of research biobanks relies on the assumption that the only ethically relevant interests are those that concern risks to subjects' welfare or well-being. Once materials have been collected, and any further risks have been reduced to near-zero by de-identification, it follows that no further protection of the interests of research subjects is required.

Biobanks that collect and store participants' clinical and genetic information have become important tools in genomic research, disseminating data to a large number of investigators conducting genome-wide association studies and other genomic research. The ubiquity of these biobanks in research and the fact that many of their uses will be undetermined at the time a participant consents pose a host of ethical challenges related to privacy rights, participant consent, and data sharing.

This qualitative, ethnographic project addresses a "Grand Challenge" for the future of genomic research and a NHGRI ELSI Research Program priority area: the analysis of the impact of genomics on concepts of race, ethnicity, and individual and group identity.

Biomedical research involving humans generates results that fall on a continuum of potential interest to participants. Some results, such as blood pressure, have obvious clinical utility, and elevated blood pressure is actionable by taking blood pressure medication. At the other end of the continuum, results from research on the genetics of complex diseases holds great promise for future clinical management; however the results are not immediately actionable and may only be of scientific interest.

The policies of academic health centers (AHCs) for human subjects protection in the collection, storage, use, and sharing of biospecimens and associated data (i.e., biobanking) will have significant effects on the country's capacity to advance genetic science through collaborative multi-institutional research. Variation in policies for core issues such as informed consent to obtain biospecimens and sharing biospecimens and/or data across institutions can impede or prevent collaborative research. Our preliminary data suggest that this is already occurring.

The overall purpose of this grant is to explore the nature, extent and consequences of data-sharing and data- withholding in academic genetics and the other life sciences.

This empirical and normative bioethics research project will guide policy and practice about the disclosure of genomic incidental findings (GIFD), a much-debated topic. With ethical guidance from a multidisciplinary ELSI Working Group, we will conduct an experiment designed to develop strategies for offering incidental findings to family members of probands in a biobank for pancreatic cancer.

The objective of this project is to address the content, timing, efficacy, and impact of prenatal education about newborn screening generally and bloodspot sample retention specifically. This project has the following specific aims: Specific Aim 1) To determine what pregnant women, young mothers, and their partners want to know regarding the retention and use of residual bloodspot samples ' Methods include 15 focus groups conducted in five states (NY, CA, UT, MN, WA).