Discover data collection instruments and related materials in the Research Tools database. Please see our FAQ to learn more and email us at [email protected] to contribute your published or unpublished research tools.
31 - 34 of 34 Research Tools
-
Gene Modification Therapy Scenarios for Parents of People with Down Syndrome
Year: 2018Michie and Allyse developed five scenarios that describe existing and hypothetical interventions for symptoms of Down syndrome (DS): 1) prenatal physical intervention, 2) prenatal cognitive interve
Research Population: Parents -
The Parental Personal Utility Scale (Parent PrU)
Year: 2024The Personal Utility Scale (PrU) asks participants to rate how useful they find nineteen outcomes of genome sequencing on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all useful) to 7 (extremely useful).
Research Population: Adults, ParentsValidation(s):Turbitt, E., Kohler, J. N., Brothers, K. B., Outram, S. M., Rini, C., Sahin-Hodoglugil, N., Leo, M. C., & Biesecker, B. B. (2024) The Parent PrU: A measure to assess personal utility of pediatric genomic results. Genetics in Medicine, 16(1), Article 100994.
Contact: [email protected] -
Questionnaire: “Data in question. ELSI Challenges in Biobank-based Research”
Year: 2019Goisef and colleagues developed a survey for professionals working in research-based biobanks in Europe that assess their satisfaction with current ELSI-related procedures.
Research Population: ResearchersContact: [email protected] -
Instrument for assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries
Year: 2002Instrument for assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries is a 38-item tool for evaluating the quality and balance of media stories reporting genetic discoveries related
Research Population: N/AValidation(s):- Mountcastle-Shah, E., Tambor, E., Bernhardt, B. A., Geller, G., Karaliukas, R., Rodgers, J. E., & Holtzman, N. A. (2003). Assessing mass media reporting of disease-related genetic discoveries: Development of an instrument and initial findings. Science Communication, 24(4), 458-478.