Primary care physicians have almost no training in genetics, nor in the ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI) of genetic testing, diagnosis and therapy. Further, mere provision of curricular content fails to impact physician behavior. However, programs with elements that are based on established educational and adult learning principles have been shown to effective in affecting behavioral change.

The objective of this training and research project is to develop the candidate into an independent and interdisciplinary ELSI researcher, with the ability to intertwine qualitative empirical with normative approaches to issues in genetics and genomics.

The purpose of this study is to provide empirical data on effects of intellectual property (IP) and commercialization on clinical translation of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) and identify potential barriers to clinical adoption and patient access. Advances in technologies for genetic analysis of cell-free fetal DNA could make NIPT routine. Early clinical trials indicate that sequencing-based NIPT tests for chromosomal aneuploidies are more accurate than currently used noninvasive screening tests.

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing, which utilizes cell-free fetal DNA and advances in sequencing technology, is revolutionizing the practice of obstetrics. While currently used as a screen for a limited number of aneuploidies and genetic conditions, noninvasive testing is anticipated to employ whole fetal exome and genome sequencing to identify not only monogenic disorders but also microduplications, microdeletions, and variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing (NIPT) is revolutionizing the practice of obstetrics. However, the technol- ogy is expanding rapidly and in a way that has outpaced the rate at which evidence-based strategies for its in- tegration can be developed and implemented. Initially, NIPT was used as a screen for a limited number of an- euploidies and genetic conditions.

Recent expansions in prenatal genetic testing have renewed concerns from both disability advocates and right- to-life movements that these tests serve primarily to enable elective terminations, However, as prenatal genetic testing becomes easier, safer, and more accessible, many women say they choose it for a very different reason: preparation.

PROJECT NARRATIVE Preparation is often cited as a reason for offering and for accepting prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. However, this term has no clear definition, and thus it is impossible either to prove benefit or to recommend best practices.

PROJECT NARRATIVE The goal of this study is to study the effect of an evidence-based communication tool to support patients? decision-making about noninvasive prenatal genetic testing, by focusing on the communication that takes place in the clinical encounter.