PROJECT NARRATIVE This project is relevant to public health because achieving the health benefits of preventive gene editing research will depend on governance that is responsive to public concerns. This project is relevant to NHGRI?s mission because of the role that new genomic knowledge will play in the policy challenges that the research proposed here helps address.
This project would address several questions concerning parental rights and responsibilities in forming families and the morality of using genetic technology to prevent or create children with impairments: 1) Are genetic impairments subject to greater concern than other alleged sources of harm to future children? If so, is that greater concern justified? 2) Do public attitudes, practices, and policies toward reproductive conduct take account of whether that conduct affects the identity of the future child? Should they?
The launch of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP), and the corresponding interest in bioengineered probiotic therapies that this new NIH initiative is likely to generate, provide a unique opportunity for research examining ethical and social considerations in the introduction of new therapeutic modalities. To date, analysis of ethical and social considerations in the use of probiotics have focused on "over the counter" applications where physician involvement in the selection and administration of the probiotic is limited.
We propose an exploratory survey, parallel to the Human Microbiome Project (HMP), of the emergent ethical, legal, and social issues associated with human microbiome research. We will implement this study using in- depth interviews with key stakeholders in the HMP, including individuals who are recruited to the HMP but decline participation, study participants, and investigators and project leaders involved in planning for an conducting the first phases of the HMP.
This project explores whether the current regulations for protecting research subjects will provide adequate protections and guidance for future research involving human prenatal gene therapy. It seeks to determine whether additions or other revisions to the regulations are needed to deal with the ethical issues that will be raised in protecting human subjects in such research. Examples of issues that will need to be addressed include the following: 1) The current regulations do not specify how risks and benefits should be balanced between the fetus and pregnant woman.
Most discussion of the ethical challenges raised by the growth of research biobanks relies on the assumption that the only ethically relevant interests are those that concern risks to subjects' welfare or well-being. Once materials have been collected, and any further risks have been reduced to near-zero by de-identification, it follows that no further protection of the interests of research subjects is required.
Forensic DNA profiling is increasingly becoming a standard tool in the search for missing people in the aftermath of mass violence and mass disaster. Yet, there has been very little systematic effort to identify and analyze the major ethical and policy challenges associated with this new use of genetic technology. Thus, stakeholders involved in post-conflict and post-disaster investigations have had to develop their own ad hoc rules and ethical principles for the identification process.
The Advancing Research Ethics training in Southern Africa (ARESA) program will promote responsible research in southern Africa by offering a postgraduate Diploma/Masters level educational program to health care and other professionals in research ethics and by developing a national network for Research Ethics Committee (REC) members.