-
NIH May 10, 2007 | R01
Do Physicians Understand Uncertain Variants and Other Genetic Test Results?
Institution: Baylor College of Medicine
FOA Number: PA-04-050
Abstract
Testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility genes has been performed in over 70,000 individuals. Like other sequence-based tests, the results can reveal a normal sequence, a clearly deleterious mutation or a sequence variant of uncertain significance (VUS), in which it is not known whether the VUS confers an increased cancer risk. VUS results are confusing and occur in approximately 12% of tests. Their adequate interpretation requires a basic understanding of genetic principles, the laboratory methods utilized and pedigree analysis. No studies, however, have been published that assess the interpretation and clinical recommendations of non-geneticist physicians receiving a VUS result for BRCA gene sequencing and our own clinical experience suggests that many physicians categorize all VUS results as deleterious mutations potentially leading to inappropriate management recommendations.
Hypothesis: Non-geneticist physicians do not discriminate between a VUS and a deleterious mutation when making recommendations with regard to breast and ovarian cancer risk management. Study Design: We will optimize and administer to members of the Texas Medical Association (internists, family practitioners, obstetrician-gynecologists, general surgeons, and oncologists) an on-line questionnaire that presents case scenarios that include BRCA test results that are deleterious, negative or have one or more VUS. A control group of experts in cancer genetics will be included. Physicians will be queried on testing options for at-risk individuals in the family, impact of the test result on cancer risk and asked to choose among a range of management options. Statistical analysis will determine whether the "path" of responses to a VUS result is more similar to a clearly deleterious or negative result. These results will be used to develop appropriate CME-eligible educational materials and to design genetic testing report formats that decrease areas of confusion identified in the survey. Relevance: Consistent with the goals of the NHGRI to bring "Genomics to Health" it is imperative that we optimize the appropriate interpretation of sequence-based genetic tests by a variety of physician specialties for use in clinical decision making. With the increasing availability of complex testing modalities, e.g. DNA and RNA gene chips, for a variety of both rare and common diseases, appropriate reporting and physician education must accompany the development of these tests.
FUNDING AGENCY:
Funder:
NIHInstitute:
NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTEFunding Type:
R01Project Number:
R01HG004064Start Date:
May 10, 2007End Date:
Apr 30, 2010PROJECT TERMS:
Base Sequence, BRCA1 gene, BRCA2 gene, Breast, cancer genetics, cancer risk, Cancer-Predisposing Gene, Categories, Clinical, Complex, condition, Confusion, Control Groups, Decision Making, design, Development, Disease, DNA, Education, Educational Materials, Electronics, Evaluation, experience, Family, Gene Chips, General Practitioners, Genes, Genetic, genetic pedigree, Genetic screening method, Genomics, Goals, Gynecologist, Health, improved, Individual, Internist, Intervention Studies, Laboratories, Language, licensing, Malignant neoplasm of ovary, Malignant Neoplasms, Measures, Medical, medical specialties, Medical Surveillance, member, Methods, Modality, Modeling, Mutation, Oncologist, Patients, Physicians, Predisposition, Prevention, programs, Publishing, Questionnaires, Range, Recommendation, Relative (related person), Reporting, Research Design, Research Personnel, response, Risk, Risk Assessment, risk management, RNA, Surgeon, Surveys, Test Result, Testing, Texas, Variant