Skip to main content
Series
The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022

ELSIcon2022 Paper: Is it just for a screening program to give people all the information they want?

Type
Conference

ELSIcon2022 • Paper • June 2, 2022

Lisa Dive, Ainsley Newson

What normative role should people’s preferences should play in determining access to genomic information, particularly in relation to just and equitable design of reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) programs? Many prefer to receive information about both the genetic variants they carry and those that their (potential future) offspring may carry too, if offered the opportunity. However, information about genetic variants that are of uncertain significance, or are not associated with severe genetic conditions usually lacks clinical (and perhaps personal) utility. We will argue that – especially in large-scale RGCS– there are both pragmatic and ethical reasons to restrict information provision to that which is relevant to the purpose of testing.
In RGCS, the aim is to inform reproductive decision making. Drawing on a pluralistic public health ethics perspective, we will argue that RGCS program design must respond to justice and equity considerations. These factors support a carefully curated gene list in the context of a program that ensures equitable access to screening, as well as follow-up interventions if required. We argue: (1) that a couples-based approach to reporting results is preferable as this best supports the aims of RGCS; and (2) that we should not accept patient preferences at face value, especially if they were discerned via quantitative methods only. Finally, we argue that if RGCS is to be offered at scale a cautious approach with a judiciously curated gene list is warranted. This approach carefully balances the potential benefits of RGCS with sustainability within healthcare systems more generally.

Tags

Keywords
Live
Paper
Return of Results
Genetic testing and screening

Videos in Series

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 12

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: Fresh Air for Genetic Data Sharing

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Flash Session 2

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Moderated Plenary Panel

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 14

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 13

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 17

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 15

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 10

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 11

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 9

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 8

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 7

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Trainee Networking Session: Working with NHGRI

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: Diversity’s Pandemic Distractions

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 6

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 5

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 4

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 3

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 2

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Paper Session 1

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022: Flash Session 1

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: ELSI and the New Precision Stewards?

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: Toward an anthropology of rare disease

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: In the Shadows of Virtual Family Trees

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: The ELSI of Pandemic Biobanking

The 5th ELSI Congress - ELSIcon2022 - ELSIcon2022 Paper: Whose future should we worry about?

Related Videos